【本文存在真確性爭議】
編按：Fact-checker Snopes 指出有關的研究並非由獨立的研究機構進行，並由反疫票團體贊助。撰寫研究報告的其中一個作者Anthony Mawson，是反疫苗運動的推手，文章於Translational Science期刊的出版費為美金2千。此外，在數據的處理上，研究也有很多謬誤，詳見 ‘First Ever’ Study Comparing Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children Shows Harm from Vaccines? 一文
如果免疫針真正有效預防疾病，那麼打過免疫針的兒童理應健康於無打過免疫針的兒童。 其實，想孩兒健康是許多父母盲從免疫針計劃的原因。 然而，反免疫針人士，如美國總統杜林普（Donald Trump），發覺：過敏、哮喘、自閉症和學習障礙的兒童越來越多。 這只是巧合嗎？
以下科學研究認為答案是否定的。傑克遜州立大學（Jackson State University）最近一項突破研究發現：無打免疫針的兒童健康問題少過打過的很多。 這項研究是第一個同類研究，研究了四個州六至十二歲，六百六十六名自家教育兒童；比較二百六十一名未無打免疫針的兒童與四百零五名打過全部或部份免疫針的兒童， 評估其總體健康狀況。 研究結果本月發表於科學學報 Translational Sciences 。
無打免疫針的兒童健康問題較少的事實本身已令人難以置信，但真正驚人的是兩組人的整體健康狀況差異巨大。 其實，其中一些發現絕對震撼人心。 例如，打過免疫針的兒童確診患花粉症（過敏性鼻炎）的機會高於未打過的同齡人三十倍，而嚴重過敏，需要藥物治療，的機會高二十二倍。
此外，發現打過免疫針的兒童確診患注意力缺陷多動障礙的機會增加百分之三百，患肺炎機會增加百分之三百四十。打過免疫針的兒童患耳道感染的機會亦增百分之三百，要開刀插入耳道引流管的機會增百分之七百。 耳朵感染現影響美國五分之三三歲以下兒童，是這個年齡組中，見兒科醫生和抗生素處方的主要原因。
儘管所謂專家一再保證免疫針不會導致自閉症，但打過免疫針的兒童確診自閉症的機會高於無打過的三倍。打過免疫針的兒童確診任何類型慢性病的機會，亦高於無打過免疫針的兒童兩倍半。 這極可能解釋了何以百分之四十三的美國兒童 - 共三千二百萬人 - 至少患二十種慢性疾病中之一種，機會高於其父母有四倍。
何以這個研究如此不尋常？
很難相信，這樣的研究以前從未做過，但問題是幾乎所有的美國兒童都打了免疫針，即並無大量對比對象可用於研究長期影響。由於有其他變數發揮作用，比較美國一般兒童與不常打免疫針的地區，如阿米甚人社區，有問題。 然而，美國綠色雜誌Natural News（二零一七）認為這項研究比較自家教育兒童與自家教育兒童，不僅是平等比較，而且有用，事關自家教育兒童人口實際完全吻合美全國一般家庭狀況。
綠色環保人士，例如Isabelle Z. （二零一七），認為這項研究儘管前所未有，並且產生許多令人驚訝的有用數據，但大概不會廣傳。免疫針太賺錢了，有助解釋何以今日的兒童六歲就接受了十四種免疫針，共五十劑。藥廠會不惜一切維護這稞搖錢樹，極可能力保大多數人永遠都不會聽見這些令人震驚的發現。
查實，有關學術論文的撮要一六年曾刊於Frontiers in Public Health學刊，但學刊後來受了某些重大壓力，撤回論文撮要。今年四月有關論文全文刊於Translational Sciences， 但Translational Sciences五月初又受壓撤回論文，然而五月十八日Translational Sciences再次令論文重見天日。
本港綠色先鋒周兆祥博士（二零一零）認為自閉症及肥胖症與打免疫針關係密切。「二零零六年月十二日, CDC在一份文章中已公開聲明：『沒有免疫針是絕對安全和有效的。』在美國，有不少嬰兒「無原無故」死亡，西醫叫這做『嬰兒猝死症』。但有人調查發現這現象與疫苗注射有關，因為大部份死亡發生在二、四、六月大的嬰兒上，這是嬰兒接受注射的月份！但當局極力隱瞞、漠視這問題！ 將為人父母的你，快快了解清楚這生命的第一度險阻。」
免責聲明：本文客觀介紹有關學術論文的發現，絕不代表刊登本文的傳媒立場。如有疑問，請直接聯絡論文作者Anthony R Mawson、Brian D Ray、Azad R Bhuiyan、Binu Jacob。有關學術論文作者聯絡資料如下：
Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children
Anthony R Mawson
Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39213, USA
Brian D Ray
President, National Home Education Research Institute, PO Box 13939, Salem, OR 97309, USA
Azad R Bhuiyan
Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39213, USA
Binu Jacob
Former graduate student, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39213, USA
DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000186
論文撮要：
Abstract
Vaccinations have prevented millions of infectious illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths among U.S. children, yet the long-term health outcomes of the vaccination schedule remain uncertain. Studies have been recommended by the U.S. Institute of Medicine to address this question. This study aimed 1) to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children on a broad range of health outcomes, and 2) to determine whether an association found between vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), if any, remained significant after adjustment for other measured factors. A cross-sectional study of mothers of children educated at home was carried out in collaboration with homeschool organizations in four U.S. states: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Oregon. Mothers were asked to complete an anonymous online questionnaire on their 6- to 12-year-old biological children with respect to pregnancy-related factors, birth history, vaccinations, physician-diagnosed illnesses, medications used, and health services. NDD, a derived diagnostic measure, was defined as having one or more of the following three closely-related diagnoses: a learning disability, Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder, and Autism Spectrum Disorder. A convenience sample of 666 children was obtained, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated. The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDD. After adjustment, vaccination, male gender, and preterm birth remained significantly associated with NDD. However, in a final adjusted model with interaction, vaccination but not preterm birth remained associated with NDD, while the interaction of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with a 6.6-fold increased odds of NDD (95% CI: 2.8, 15.5). In conclusion, vaccinated homeschool children were found to have a higher rate of allergies and NDD than unvaccinated homeschool children. While vaccination remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors, preterm birth coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples and stronger research designs is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.
參考：http://naturalnews.com/2017-05-17-report-unvaccinated-children-have-sign...