Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 11:35:55 PM
Subject: Fw: The future offer by Lightness-Society
The real story behind the story of 1989/6/4 (I dream up last night),
In 1989, June 4, we all know what happen in Beijing. The untold story is that just right before TVB/ATV news department are thinking of reporting the brutal massacre with live picture, Lightness Society chairperson make a preemptive strike by warning these content they are going to broadcast is unsuitable for not just children, but too bloody and scary for people of any age. Also at the other end, they call their accomplice working within OAT to make any preparation of complain. Fearing of backlash from Christian-right and conservative moralist, these bloody scenes are cleansed from the TV screen.
The consequence? Chairperson Ma of DAB(Pro-Beijing party) can deny the whole massacre before Hong Kong audience never see it in their eye. He is technically correct because he never see it in TV.
The applications? Enormous.
2006 Anti-WTO demonstration is too brutal, therefore no visual picture is delivered on TV; all web-clip are censored because of its violence nature. Website display them would be fined heavily, newspaper can't describe it because of its violence nature; plus someone is yelling vulgar language, therefore obscene.
Since we don't have the channels to know what is really happening, we would have to believe the version offer by HK police: WanChai is still free to walk, and no fortress is built.
2006-7: Various riots within China caused by real-estate development. Again, too bloody as well as the villager shouting in vulgar language, some of them are without clothes. How could OAT let those obscene and indecent picture reach the innocuous children? Are we not teaching our children the value of obedience(conforming), and shy away from violence. Violence is never a means to anything in a civil society!
2006: Aids devastate Africa, of course, could not be reported because of the same reason; Aids is a sexual transmitted disease. It is ugly, indecent and definitely obscene. Are we not encouraging children to have causal sex? Thereby destroys the traditional family value?
2006: Iraqi war, what? It doesn't exist in TV because the possible ill effect for our children(bloody, violent and obscene). We got to trust this war never had one causality, and Iraqi army just throw down their arms and embrace American-British troop with open arm.
All: Africa Starvation. No, seeing people dying is definitely indecent for anyone to watch. Plus, you see some of them are naked thereby exposing their genitals. And we can't ascertain of the topic of their conversation, whether gesture is not indecent.
All suicidal bomber, terrorism, 9/11: How can we let our children expose to those horrible scene and the horrible ideas behind it? It is not suitable for all ages!
History: Crusade, Spanish Inquisition, Witch-Hunting, Dark Age, Protestant-Catholic warfare in Europe, WWII, WWI, Holocaust, The Rape of Nanking, nuclear explosion in Japan should not be in detail description; no books nor videos about it should be sold to anyone.
Thanks to Light-Society we truly see the Lighter side of the world!
(More insulting note: For those fundamentalist Christian, Bible already contain the Truth of the world. We doesn't need any other books beside it. Why do we need news when Bible have it all? )